STRATEGIC GOVERNANCE, LEADERSHIP INTEGRITY, AND STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT IN RESPONSIBLE AI ADOPTION IN SECURITY SERVICE INDUSTRY
Main Article Content
Hotasi Albin Sumitro
Achmad Fajar Hendarman
The security service industry is increasingly adopting Artificial Intelligence (AI) to enhance surveillance accuracy, operational efficiency, and decision-making processes. Despite its benefits, AI adoption in this sector raises significant concerns related to ethical responsibility, governance, and stakeholder trust. This study examines the role of strategic governance, leadership integrity, and stakeholder engagement in shaping responsible AI adoption within the security service industry.A quantitative research approach was employed using survey data collected from employees across different managerial levels and functional units within a security service organization. The data were analyzed using multiple linear regression after meeting validity, reliability, and classical assumption requirements. The results indicate that strategic governance, leadership integrity, and stakeholder engagement each have a positive and statistically significant effect on responsible AI adoption. Leadership integrity emerges as the most influential factor, highlighting the importance of ethical leadership behavior in guiding responsible technology use.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical Leadership: A Review and Future Directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595–616.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Sage Publications.
Campbell, J. (2017). Leadership and Problem-Solving: Applying the STAR Framework. Oxford University Press.
Deloitte. (2025). Strategic Governance of AI: A Roadmap for the Future. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance.
Deloitte. (2025). AI Governance and Risk Management Frameworks. Deloitte Insights.
Epstein, M. J. (2008). Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental, and economic impacts. Berrett-Koehler.
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Financial Times. (2024). AI Governance and Corporate Responsibility: Case Studies. Retrieved from https://www.ft.com
Financial Times. (2024). AI Risks in Surveillance and Corporate Governance. FT Special Report.
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., et al. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707.
Forvis Mazars. (2024, November). The Importance of AI Governance. Retrieved from https://www.forvismazars.us
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Harvard Business Review. (2023). The Board’s Role in AI Oversight. Harvard Business Publishing.
Inside AI News. (2024, October 17). The Essential Role of Governance in Mitigating AI Risk. Retrieved from https://insideainews.com
International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP). (2024). AI Governance in Practice: Professional Report. Retrieved from https://iapp.org
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389–399.
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
Kong, E. (2019). Strategic Action and Results: Applying the STAR Framework in Organizational Studies. Journal of Management Research, 21(4), 233–249.
Kominfo. (2024). Indonesia Digital Roadmap 2024–2030. Ministry of Communication and Information Technology.
Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and Practice (9th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
OECD. (2023). OECD Framework for the Classification of AI Systems. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2019). OECD Principles on Artificial Intelligence. OECD Publishing.
Palanski, M. E., & Yammarino, F. J. (2009). Integrity and leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 405–420.
Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
PwC. (2024). AI Governance for Risk Leaders. PwC Global Insights.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (7th ed.). Wiley.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.
The Australian. (2024). AI Trust Gap Report. Retrieved from https://www.theaustralian.com.au
Weiss, J. W. (1998). Business ethics: A stakeholder and issues management approach. South-Western College Publishing.
World Economic Forum. (2024). Responsible AI: Global Principles and Best Practices. WEF White Paper.
World Economic Forum. (2024). Responsible AI Guidelines for Industry Adoption. WEF Centre for the Fourth Industrial Revolution.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Zhang, H., et al. (2024). The Role of Chief AI Officers in Strategic Governance. arXiv preprint.
